Meeting software is judged in the worst five minutes of the month: the client call from a train, the presentation over hotel Wi-Fi, the interview with a guest on a rural connection. That is what we tested across three months of daily use and around 120 calls.
It holds when the connection does not
Zoom's compression prioritises intelligibility over resolution, so a struggling connection produces a soft picture and clear audio rather than a frozen face and robot voice. Competitors have improved, but in side-by-side tests on a deliberately throttled connection Zoom remained usable longest.
Joining is also still the smoothest for outside guests, which matters more than any feature when the person on the other end is a client.
The AI Companion is quietly useful
Summaries with decisions and action items land in your inbox minutes after the call. Across 30 recorded meetings the summary was accurate enough to use as the record in most cases.
- Strong: agreed actions, deadlines, main topics
- Weak: attribution when people talk over each other
- Habit that helps: state decisions clearly out loud before moving on
Pricing corners
Pro at $15 per user is reasonable. Webinars, larger meetings, phone and storage are add-ons, and it is easy to end up with a bill that surprises you. If your organisation already pays for Microsoft 365, Teams costs you nothing extra and does 85% of this.
Who should pay
Consultants, agencies, sales teams, anyone whose meetings involve people outside the company. Internal-only teams inside a Microsoft or Google shop should use what they already own.
Verdict
Unfashionable, dependable and still the best in the specific moment it matters most. Buy it for external calls; do not pay twice for internal ones.